If you are injured by someone’s dog, it is normal to think about filing a claim to get compensated for the injuries that you have sustained due to the dog bite. However, things change significantly if you think that the dog was provoked by some of your actions. Therefore, in such cases it is better to take help from a good personal injury lawyer in Kitchener who would be able to protect your interests and help you win the claim as the first thing that would be told by the defendant’s lawyer once the lawsuit is filed is that you were partially at fault for what all happened.

The owner of the dog might claim that you were trespassing in the property or in some other way breaking the law or were doing something which was not expected of you and as a result of your action, the dog ended up causing the injuries. The place at which the injuries took place would also help decide whether the dog owner has a legal defense or not. However, in all this, you must mention it privately to your injury lawyer in Kitchener as to whether you had some blame to share for the mishap or not. Your lawyer would accordingly work on the strategy to defend you and help you in the case.

Most states have different rules for shared fault. If you check with your personal injury lawyer in Kitchener, you would get to know that the states have three basic premises to decide how to resolve the claim in case the plaintiff was also partially at fault. The first way that is followed by some states is that of pure comparative negligence. The states following this ensure that as the percentage of fault of the plaintiff goes up in the mishap, their compensation would accordingly get reduced. This would however, hold true even if the plaintiff was to share most of the blame for the accident.

The second premise that the states follow to decide the same is that of modified comparative negligence. Your injury lawyer in Kitchener would tell you that the states that follow this rule make sure that in case the liability of the plaintiff is more than 50% in the mishap, he or she would not receive any compensation in that case. Therefore, if your state follows modified comparative negligence, your lawyer would help you understand as to what are your chances of recovering the compensation if you are to share the blame for the mishap.

The third and the final premise that some of the states follow in such cases is that of contributory negligence. Your personal injury lawyer in Kitchener would tell you that in case the plaintiff has even the slightest of liability, they w6ould not get any compensation for the mishap. For more information visit here: ABPC Personal injury Lawyer